• E-ISSN 2583-6811
  • Follow us

Journal of Contemporary Politics

Article

Journal of Contemporary Politics

Year: 2023, Volume: 2, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-14

Original Article

China’s Consensus Hegemony Approach and its Engagement with South Asia

Received Date:16 January 2023, Accepted Date:18 March 2023, Published Date:28 March 2023

Abstract

China has enhanced its friendly engagement with South Asia in recent times, especially India. For the emergence of China as a great power in Asia, it wants to avoid any sort of resistance from regional countries and in this pursuance China considers India could be the hindrance. China is recently increasing diplomatic and economic engagement with the South Asian countries, after it has successfully implemented its ‘feel-good’ diplomacy in Central Asia and Southeast Asia. China’s diplomatic initiative is based on Gramsci’s ‘consensus’ theory approach by embracing the regional countries through cooperation and consensus in order to ensure that no one should oppose its supremacy in Asia.

Keywords: China, Hegemony, South Asia, Consensus

References

  1. Shambaugh D. China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order. International Security. 2005;29(3):64–99. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4137556
  2. Mearsheimer JJ. China's Unpeaceful Rise. Current History. 2006;105(690):160–162. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2006.105.690.160
  3. Chang-Liao Nc. China’s New Foreign Policy under Xi Jinping. Asian Security . 2016;12(2):82–91. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2016.1183195
  4. Godbole A. China’s Asia Strategy under President Xi Jinping. Strategic Analysis . 2015;39(3):298–302. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2015.1022321
  5. Schweller RL, Pu X. After Unipolarity: China's Visions of International Order in an Era of U.S. Decline. International Security. 2011;36(1):41–72. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41289688
  6. Hobden S, Jones RW. Marxist theories of international relations. In: Baylis J, SS, PO., eds. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. (pp. 144-158) London, UK. Oxford University Press. 2008.
  7. Cox RW. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1981;10(2):126–155. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501
  8. Germain RD, Kenny M. Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians. Review of International Studies. 1998;24(1):3–21. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097503
  9. Cox RW. Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations : An Essay in Method. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1983;12(2):162–175. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298830120020701
  10. Jr. JSN. Limits of American Power. Political Science Quarterly. 2002-2003;117(4):545–559. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/798134
  11. Medeiros ES, Fravel MT. China's New Diplomacy. Foreign Affairs. 2003;82(6):22–35. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/20033754
  12. Thayer CA. China’s ‘New Security Concept’ and Southeast Asia. In: DWL., ed. Asia-Pacific Security. (pp. 89-107) ANU Press. 2013.
  13. Ratner M, Nelson GM, Lawrence SV. China’s Natural Gas: Uncertainty for Markets. CRS Report. Available from: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/R44483.pdf
  14. Sheives K. China Turns West: Beijing's Contemporary Strategy towards Central Asia. Pacific Affairs. 2006;79(2):205–224. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40022689
  15. Santis HD. The Dragon and the Tigers: China and Asian Regionalism. World Policy Journal. 2005;22(2):23–36. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40209960
  16. Yoshihara T, Holmes JR. China's Energy-Driven ‘Soft Power’. Orbis. 2008;52(1):123–137. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2007.10.007
  17. Menon VB. India-China Relations: Critical issues. In: Harshe R., ed. Engaging the world. (pp. 157-167) New Delhi, India. Orient Blackswan. 2004.
  18. Panda JP. Future of India–China Boundary: Leadership Holds the Key? Strategic Analysis. 2015;39(3):287–292. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2015.1022319
  19. Malik MJ. India and China Bound to Collide. In: Kumaraswamy PR., ed. Security Beyond Survival: Essays for K. Subrahmanyam. (pp. 127-166) New Delhi, India. Sage. 2004.
  20. Goud S, Mookherjee M. China in Indian Ocean Region . (pp. 1-288) New Delhi, India. Allied Publishers. 2015.
  21. Kondapalli S. Maritime Silk Road: Increasing Chinese Inroads into the Maldives. Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) . Available from: http://www.ipcs.org/comm_select.php?articleNo=4735
  22. Singh A. China’s Maritime Silk Route: Implications for India. China’s Maritime Silk Route: Implications for India. IDSA Comment. Available from: http://www.idsa.in/idsacomments/ChinasMaritimeSilkRoute_AbhijitSingh_160714 (accessed )
  23. Polachek SW. Conflict and Trade. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1980;24(1):55–78. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/173934
  24. Rusko CJ, Sasikumar K. India and China: From Trade to Peace? Asian Perspective. 2007;31(4):99–123. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42704610
  25. Randol S. How to Approach the Elephant: Chinese Perceptions of India in the Twenty-first Century. Asian Affairs: An American Review. 2008;34(4):211–226. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/30172674
  26. Yung CD, Rustici R, Devary S, Lin J. Not an Idea We Have to Shun”: Chinese Overseas Basing Requirements in the 21st Century. In: PCS., ed. China Strategic Perspectives, No. 7. (pp. 1-72) Washington, D.C., USA. National Defense University Press. 2014.

Copyright

© 2023 Published by Bangalore University. This is an open-access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.